Common types of patent office actions:
Type of patent Office Action | Meaning | What we do |
Restriction Requirement | This is issued when the examiner believes the application contains more than one invention and requires the applicant to select which invention should be examined first. | We will work with you in deciding which invention to elect for examination and the attorney will prepare a response to the USPTO. |
Non-Final Rejection | This is an initial rejection of the patent application. It’s not the final decision, and there exists an opportunity to respond to the examiner’s arguments. Expect to receive this rejection; almost all applications do. | The attorney will draft a response to the examiner’s arguments, with or without amendments to the application. We will work with you to understand the examiner’s concerns and help prepare a response. |
Final Rejection | If the issues raised in the non-final rejection aren’t adequately addressed, a final rejection may be issued. There may or may not be ways to move forward with the application. | We will review the decision and discuss the next steps with you. |
Notice of Allowance | This is a notice that the patent application will be granted, and it precedes the issuance of the patent. | Congratulations! You will soon have a patent. |
Patent Maintenance Fees | These are the fees paid to maintain a granted patent in force | If the patent is not licensed, we will evaluate whether to maintain it. |
Common reasons for rejection:
Type of Rejection | Meaning |
Ineligible Subject Matter (35 U.S.C. 101) | Not all types of inventions can be patented, for example, the invention might fall into a category that’s not eligible for a patent (like abstract ideas or natural phenomena). |
Lack of Novelty (35 U.S.C. 102) | This occurs when the examiner believes that the invention is not new or has been publicly disclosed before the filing date of the application. |
Obviousness (35 U.S.C. 103) | The examiner believes that the invention is obvious to a person “skilled in the art,” that is, someone with your technical background could have come up with the invention based on knowledge known to people in your profession. |
Insufficient Disclosure (35 U.S.C. 112) | The patent application must fully describe the invention so that a person skilled in the art can reproduce it. |
Indefiniteness (35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph) | The language claiming the invention must be clear and precise. If the examiner finds it vague or ambiguous, it may be rejected. |
How we proceed with Office Actions
When we receive a copy of an Office Action from the attorney, we will send you a copy for your records. Typically, we then give the attorney time to review the Office Action and to make recommendations to us. At that point, we will inform you about the actions the attorney plans to take, and we can assist you in understanding the examiner’s concerns. The attorney then prepares a response to the USPTO.
There may be instances when the attorney requires your insight to draft the response. In such cases, we will contact you to gather your thoughts. It is crucial to remember that we are bound by the response deadlines set by the USPTO. (Missing a USPTO deadline can result in penalty fees or, in the worst case, abandonment of the application.)